tinytheorems - about groups - rings - modules - models atom/rss

Exploration 8: Galois theory

.

Questions:


In the finite fields exploration, we’ve seen that given the finite field Fp\FF_p of prime order pp, taking the quotient Fp/f\FF_p/f by an irreducible polynomial ff of degree nn gives you the finite field Fpn\FF_{p^n} of prime power order pnp^n.

We’ve also seen that quotienting by an irreducible polynomial is equivalent to adjoining a root α\alpha of that irreducible polynomial ff. In other words, if you extend a finite field FF by an algebraic element α\alpha, then F(α)F(\alpha) has its order raised to the nnth power, where nn is the degree of the minimal polynomial of α\alpha.

So we have two notions of field extension that are equivalent:

  1. We can quotient its polynomial ring by a degree nn irreducible polynomial, or
  2. we can adjoin an algebraic element whose minimal polynomial is degree nn.

For simplicity, we might want to just refer to the field extension K/FK/F that raises its order by nn. Call that a degree nn extension, and we denote degree with [K:F]=n[K:F]=n. Then the degree of an algebraic element is the degree of its minimal polynomial.

Note that this notion of degree carries over to infinite fields too. Although a degree nn extension of an infinite field results in a field that is just as infinite, the idea is that every element in the new field is a nn-tuple of elements in the original field. TODO describe finite fields as tuples

and the degree of a simple extension F(α)F(\alpha) be the degree of its primitive element α\alpha. We can also define the degree [E:F][E:F] of a finite field extension E/FE/F in general: decompose it into a composition of simple extensions by algebraic elements, and multiply the degrees of each simple extension.

Using the concept of the degree of an extension, we can start classifying some field extensions.

Theorem: A degree 11 field extension gives back a field isomorphic to the original field.
  • If F(α)F(\alpha) is degree 11, its minimal polynomial is xαx-\alpha.
  • We can show that F[x]/(xα)FF[x]/(x-\alpha)\iso F using the first ring isoomorphism theorem.
    • The evaluation map at α\alpha, φα:F[x]F\varphi_\alpha:F[x]\to F, has a kernel consisting of all polynomials with α\alpha as a root. In other words, all polynomials that have the factor xαx-\alpha, which is just the ideal (xα)(x-\alpha).
    • Since the evaluation map is surjective, im φα=F\im\varphi_\alpha=F.
    • The theorem states that F[x]/ker φαim φαF[x]/\ker\varphi_\alpha\iso\im\varphi_\alpha. In other words, F[x]/(xα)FF[x]/(x-\alpha)\iso F.

Let’s explore the degree 22 extensions.

The quadratic extensions

The canonical example of a degree 22 extension, or a quadratic extension, is R[x]/(x2+1)C\RR[x]/(x^2+1)\iso\CC, which we proved a while ago.

Since degree 22 extensions are formed by quotienting by a monic irreducible degree 22 polynomial, the general form of a quadratic extension must be the quotient F[x]/(x2+bx+c)F[x]/(x^2+bx+c). We’ll now prove a theorem that simplifies this.

Theorem: If FF is of characteristic char "338=2\ne 2, every quadratic extension of FF can be written as F[x]/(x2δ)F[x]/(x^2-\delta), which is isomorphic to F(δ)F(\sqrt{\delta}), for some element δF\delta\in F.
  • By definition, quadratic extensions are extensions of degree 22. Since finite field extensions are quotients by a suitable irreducible polynomial of the same degree, the quotient F[x]/(x2+bx+c)F[x]/(x^2+bx+c) can be used to represent any degree 22 extension.
  • You can always find the roots of x2+bx+cx^2+bx+c using the quadratic formula 12(b±b24c)\frac12(-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4c}).
    • Since 22 is in the denominator, this requires the field to not be of characteristic 22 (otherwise 2=02=0 and you can’t divide by zero).
  • This means every root adjoined by quotienting by (x2+bx+c)(x^2+bx+c) can be expressed in terms of elements of FF together with b24c\sqrt{b^2-4c}. Since b24cFb^2-4c\in F, this means we need only adjoin a square root of an element in FF to add every root of x2+bx+cx^2+bx+c, implying that F[x]/(x2+bx+c)F(b24c)F[x]/(x^2+bx+c)\iso F(\sqrt{b^2-4c}).
  • The minimal polynomial of b24c\sqrt{b^2-4c} is x2(b24c)x^2-(b^2-4c).
  • Therefore, every quadratic extension F[x]/(x2+bx+c)F[x]/(x^2+bx+c) is isomorphic to the quadratic extension F[x]/(x2(b24c))F[x]/(x^2-(b^2-4c)). If we let δ=b24c\delta=b^2-4c, then this becomes F[x]/(x2δ)F[x]/(x^2-\delta), which is isomorphic to F(δ)F(\sqrt{\delta}).

The implication is that every quadratic extension can be obtained by a square root of some element in the base field. So the general form of a quadratic extension is F(δ)F(\sqrt{\delta}) for some δF\delta\in F. Note that the proof implies that the roots of a quadratic extension are ±δ\pm\sqrt{\delta}. Therefore the roots are symmetric in a sense – adding one root δ\delta always adds the other root, because you can obtain it via δ-\delta.

Whenever two roots of the same irreducible polynomial can be expressed in terms of each other within the base field, we call them algebraic conjugates, or just conjugates. This generalizes the concept of complex conjugates in C\CC to any field extension by an algebraic element. In general, quadratic extensions always produce two conjugate roots, but larger extensions might have a larger set of roots (that are all conjugate to each other). We’ll see an example now.

The cyclotomic extensions

A nnth root of unity ζnk=exp(2πikn)\zeta_n^k=\exp(2\pi i\frac{k}{n}) is primitive if it can be used to express all the other nnth roots of unity. This is true whenever kk is coprime to nn.

The nnth cyclotomic polynomial, Φn\Phi_n, is the minimal polynomial over Q\QQ for any primitive nnth root of unity ζn\zeta_n. It’s irreducible and unique by definition of minimal polynomial, therefore we can use it to write the nnth cyclotomic extension Q[x]/(Φn)\QQ[x]/(\Phi_n).

Theorem: The roots of the nnth cyclotomic polynomial are exactly the primitive nnth roots of unity.
  • First of all it is clear that all primitive nnth roots of unity ζn\zeta_n share the same minimal polynomial (Φn\Phi_n), and are therefore roots of Φn\Phi_n.
  • Now we need to show these are the only roots of Φn\Phi_n. To do this, we make a degree argument.
  • First, note that the polynomial xn1x^n-1 contains all nnth roots of unity, not just the primitive ones. Since every nnth root of unity is a primitive ddth root of unity for some divisor dd of nn, and xn1x^n-1 (by virtue of containing all nnth roots of unity) must contain all these primitive ddth roots of unity for each dd, we can conclude that each Φd\Phi_d is a factor of xn1x^n-1. This includes Φn\Phi_n.
  • Second, note that these Φd\Phi_d are disjoint. If d1\prod_{d_1} and d2\prod_{d_2} share a root ζ\zeta, then by definition both of those polynomials must be the minimal polynomial of ζ\zeta. But minimal polynomials are unique, which implies d1=d2\prod_{d_1}=\prod_{d_2}.
  • This proves the identity xn1=dnΦdx^n-1=\prod_{d\mid n}\Phi_d.
  • Finally, note that if any root ζ\zeta of Φn\Phi_n is not a primitive nnth root of unity, then it must be a primitive ddth root of unity for some dnd\mid n. But then Φd\Phi_d and Φn\Phi_n would share a root ζ\zeta, which contradicts the fact that each Φd\Phi_d is disjoint. Thus the only roots of Φn\Phi_n are all the primitive nnth roots of unity ζn\zeta_n.

Since primitive nnth roots of unity, by definition, can express all the nnth roots of unity, adding one root adds them all. In other words, the roots of Φn\Phi_n are conjugate. Like the quadratic extensions, the cyclotomic extensions are an example of where all of the roots of the minimal polynomial are conjugate.

Since there are φ(n)\varphi(n) primitive nnth roots of unity, cyclotomic extensions are degree φ(n)\varphi(n). Note that when nn is prime, then φ(n)=n1\varphi(n)=n-1, and thus ppth cyclotomic extensions are always of degree p1p-1.

In this section, we discover properties of conjugate roots.

In both quadratic and cyclotomic extensions, all the roots we adjoined were conjugate to each other.

In general, not all roots adjoined by a field extension are conjugate to each other. One case is when a field extension is made up of multiple extensions. For example, a biquadratic extension F(α)(β)F(\sqrt{\alpha})(\sqrt{\beta}) consists of two different quadratic extensions where there is no qFq\in F such that α=q2β\alpha=q^2\beta. That last condition ensures that α\sqrt{\alpha} and β\sqrt{\beta} cannot be expressed in terms of the other in the base field FF. This means we’ve added the roots ±α\pm\alpha (which are conjugates) and ±β\pm\beta (which are conjugates), but α\alpha is not conjugate to β\beta.

Here’s a more concrete example. Over FF, take the splitting field of x32x^3-2, whose roots could be expressed as 23\sqrt[3]{2}, ζ323\zeta_3\sqrt[3]{2}, and ζ3223\zeta_3^2\sqrt[3]{2}. Taking F[x]/(x32)F[x]/(x^3-2) will give us one of the roots — perhaps 23\sqrt[3]{2} — but not the others. In order to split x32x^3-2, we must add one of the remaining roots, say ζ323\zeta_3\sqrt[3]{2}. Note that each of these three roots can be expressed with the other two:

So we only need to adjoin two of the roots in order to split x32x^3-2. Unlike the previous example, where taking a single quotient F[x]/(x2+1)F[x]/(x^2+1) was enough to split x2+1x^2+1, taking a single quotient F[x]/(x32)F[x]/(x^3-2) is not enough to create the splitting field of x32x^3-2, since it only adds one root. We can distinguish these two types of extensions.

Define a normal extension K/FK/F as a field extension of FF such that KK is the splitting field for some polynomial ff over FF. Then F[x]/(x2+1)F[x]/(x^2+1) is clearly normal, since it’s the splitting field of x2+1x^2+1. To show that F[x]/(x32)F[x]/(x^3-2) is not normal, we rely on the following theorem:

Theorem: If K/FK/F is normal, then every polynomial irreducible over FF that has a root in KK splits in KK.
  • If K/FK/F is normal, then by definition KK is the splitting field for some polynomial ff over FF.
  • Any polynomial gg irreducible over FF with a root in KK is a factor of ff, since KK (being the splitting field of ff) adds only roots of ff and nothing more.
  • But since ff splits in its splitting field KK, any factor of ff splits in KK, therefore gg splits in KK.

Corollary: By the contrapositive, if some polynomial irreducible over FF with a root in KK doesn’t split in KK, then K/FK/F is not normal.

So to prove an extension K/FK/F is normal, we need to show that it is the splitting field for some polynomial over FF. To prove an extension not normal, we need to show that it doesn’t split some polynomial irreducible over FF with a root in KK. Since F[x]/(x32)F[x]/(x^3-2) doesn’t split x32x^3-2 but contains one of its roots, F[x]/(x32)F[x]/(x^3-2) is not normal.

Normal extensions are interesting because they have the following property that we like to have:

Theorem: If K/FK/F is normal and contains a root α\alpha, then it contains all the conjugates of α\alpha.

By the previous theorem, if KK contains a root α\alpha, then it splits its minimal polynomial ff. Therefore it contains all the roots of ff, which are the conjugate roots of α\alpha.

We’ll see the implications of this property in the next section.

If we work with splitting fields, which are always normal extensions by definition, then we can always assume the following:

Therefore: Splitting fields in characteristic 00 are Galois extensions.
  • Splitting fields are normal by definition of normal definitions being splitting fields. Thus it contains all conjugates.
  • Splitting fields are finite since they need only add finitely many roots to split a finite polynomial, and all field extensions in characteristic 00 are separable. Being finite separable means the splitting fields in characteristic 00 are simple extensions F(α)F(\alpha). Since splitting fields are normal, α\alpha generates every root (not just some roots) of every irreducible polynomial over FF whose roots are in KK.
  • Such extensions (finite separable and normal) are known as Galois extensions, and they have some very interesting properties which we will explore in the next section.

In this section, we explore the intermediate fields of a Galois extension.

Again, consider the splitting field of x32x^3-2: K=F(23,ζ323)K=F(\sqrt[3]{2},\zeta_3\sqrt[3]{2}). The intermediate fields of K/FK/F refers to all the subfields of KK that contain FF (including KK and FF). It turns out that KK has six intermediate fields:

K F (∛2, ζ 3 ∛2) Fr F ( ζ 3 ) K--Fr Fs F (∛2) K--Fs Frs F ( ζ 3 ∛2) K--Frs Fr2s F ( ζ 3 2 ∛2) K--Fr2s F F Fr--F Fs--F Frs--F Fr2s--F

The basic idea is that you can try to adjoin every combination of elements in KK not in FF, i.e. every expression composed of the roots adjoined. The intermediate fields are the result. Unfortunately, there are infinite possibilities of what to adjoin, and adjoining one set of elements often gives you the same field as adjoining a different set of elements. In general, finding intermediate fields is highly non-trivial without the tools we’re about to present.

The main way we define intermediate fields of K/FK/F is by defining FF-automorphisms, automorphisms σ:KK\sigma:K\to K that fix FF.

Theorem: Elements in K/FK/F fixed by an FF-automorphism σ\sigma on KK form an intermediate field of K/FK/F.
  • All automorphisms fix the identities 00 and 11. So to prove the fixed elements of σ\sigma form a subfield of KK, we just check that they contain all additive inverses, all nonzero multiplicative inverses, and are closed under addition and multiplication.
    • Inverses: σ(a)=σ(a)=a\sigma(-a)=-\sigma(a)=-a and for nonzero aa, σ(a1)=σ(a)1=a1\sigma(a^{-1})=\sigma(a)^{-1}=a^{-1}
    • Closure: σ(a+b)=σ(a)+σ(b)=a+b\sigma(a+b)=\sigma(a)+\sigma(b)=a+b and σ(ab)=σ(a)σ(b)=ab\sigma(ab)=\sigma(a)\sigma(b)=ab
  • Since all FF-automorphisms fix FF by definition, FF is included in the fixed elements, which we just proved is a subfield of KK. That means the fixed elements must form an intermediate field of K/FK/F.

This means the task of finding intermediate fields of K/FK/F can be reduced to the task of identifying FF-automorphisms of K/FK/F.

FF-automorphisms have a number of properties that we can leverage in order to find them. First of all:

Theorem: If K/FK/F is a finite separable extension of FF, any FF-automorphism σ:KK\sigma:K\to K that fixes FF must map each root to one of its conjugates.

We have already proved this for the case that KK is a simple extension F(α)F(\alpha) of FF. Since the Primitive Element Theorem guarantees that all finite separable extensions are simple, the proof extends to all finite separable extensions.

Corollary: As all automorphisms are permutations of the given field, FF-automorphisms are exactly permutations that only permute roots of the given field extension.

Corollary: Since normal extensions K/FK/F contain all conjugate roots, FF-automorphisms of a normal extension represents a permutation of all roots adjoined to KK.

Corollary: Consider Galois extensions, which are normal and also separable (the roots adjoined to them are all distinct). This means that unique permutations on those roots correspond to unique FF-automorphisms.

Thus for non-Galois extensions it is possible that two distinct FF-automorphisms correspond to the same intermediate field, but for Galois extensions we can simply identify all permutations on roots to identify all FF-automorphisms and therefore all intermediate fields. This is the goal of the next section.

Side note: the reason normal extensions are called normal is the same reason normal subgroups are called normal subgroups – their FF-automorphisms happen to be invariant under conjugation.

Theorem: If σ\sigma and τ\tau are FF-automorphisms of a normal extension K/FK/F, then στσ1\sigma\tau\sigma^{-1} is also a FF-automorphism of K/FK/F.
  • First of all, since each of σ,τ,σ1\sigma,\tau,\sigma^{-1} fix FF, the composition fixes FF as well.
  • Second, since each of σ,τ,σ1\sigma,\tau,\sigma^{-1} are automorphisms in a normal extension, they represent permutations on the roots of polynomials.
  • Permutations compose, so the composition also permutes the roots of polynomials, and is thus a FF-automorphism of K/FK/F.

In this section, we identify the permutations on roots of a field extension.

The last corollary showed that for Galois extensions, we can count the number of FF-automorphisms by counting the number of permutations of the roots in KK. Define the Galois group G(K/F)G(K/F) of an extension K/FK/F as the set of all FF-automorphisms on KK, which represent permutations on the roots adjoined to KK. These permutations form a group, since you can always invert a permutation, and the composition of two permutations is a permutation and is an associative operation, and there is an identity permutation that swaps no roots.

Here are some theorems about Galois groups and extensions which we’ll use later:

Theorem: The degree of any Galois extension K/FK/F is equal to the order of its Galois group G(K/F)G(K/F).
  • The order of G(K/F)G(K/F) is precisely the number of FF-automorphisms of KK.
  • Recall that a Galois extension is finite separable, and therefore has a primitive element α\alpha (which is a root). Since every root adjoined to KK can be expressed in terms of the primitive element α\alpha, each FF-automorphism σ\sigma is characterized by where it sends α\alpha.
  • Since K/FK/F is normal, every root of ff is in KK and can be mapped to (i.e. are candidates for σ(α)\sigma(\alpha)). Since K/FK/F is separable, these roots are distinct. Thus there are deg f\deg f possible FF-automorphisms, one for each of the deg f\deg f distinct roots of ff.
  • In other words, the order of the Galois group G(K/F)|G(K/F)| is equal to the degree of ff, which is the degree of K/FK/F by definition.

Theorem: The roots of an irreducible polynomial are interchangeable under the Galois group. In other words, if K/FK/F is a Galois extension and ff is irreducible over FF, the Galois group G(K/F)G(K/F) acts transitively on the roots of ff.

If α\alpha and β\beta are roots of ff, then F(α)F(\alpha) and F(β)F(\beta) are isomorphic. But this isomorphism is an FF-automorphism in the splitting field KK, since it fixes FF and swaps α\alpha and β\beta. Therefore there is indeed a FF-automorphism in G(K/F)G(K/F) that maps arbitrary α\alpha to arbitrary β\beta.

Theorem: If K/FK/F is Galois of prime degree pp, its Galois group G(K/F)G(K/F) is cyclic.

If K/FK/F is Galois of degree pp, its Galois group G(K/F)G(K/F) is also of order pp, and therefore cyclic.

Lemma: A Galois extension K/FK/F is also a Galois extension K/LK/L over every intermediate field LL of K/FK/F.
  • Lemma 1: If K/FK/F is normal, then for any intermediate field LL, K/LK/L is normal.

    K/FK/F, being normal, is the splitting field for some polynomial ff over FF. Since it is a splitting field, KK is already the minimal field containing FF together with the roots of ff. Then KK is also the minimal field containing any intermediate field LL of K/FK/F together with the roots of ff, meaning it is also the splitting field for ff over LL, and thus K/LK/L is normal.

  • Lemma 2: If K/FK/F is separable, then for any intermediate field LL, K/LK/L is separable.
    • Recall that an extension K/FK/F is separable if every element of KK is the root of a separable polynomial over FF. Recall that a separable polynomial has no repeated roots.
    • Every minimal polynomial gg over LL is potentially of lesser degree than the corresponding minimal polynomial ff over FF, due to LL containing more roots than FF. Thus, gg divides ff over LL.
    • That means every root of gg is a root of ff. That implies that fF[x]f\in F[x] is has distinct roots, gL[x]g\in L[x] has distinct roots too. So separable polynomials in F[x]F[x] are also separable polynomials in L[x]L[x].
    • K/FK/F is separable, so every element of KK is a root of some separable polynomial over FF, which we just showed are also separable polynomials over LL, implying that K/LK/L is separable.
  • A Galois extension is one that is normal and separable. If K/FK/F is normal and separable, then K/LK/L is normal by Lemma 1, and separable by Lemma 2, thus Galois.

Recall that quadratic extensions (degree 22 Galois extensions) are always obtainable by adjoining a square root. We can generalize this to prime degree Galois extensions. It turns out that, like quadratic extensions, they are always obtainable by adjoining a ppth root, provided that the base field contains the ppth roots of unity. This last requirement was not necessary for quadratic extensions, since the 22nd roots of unity are 11 and 1-1, which always exist.

Theorem: Degree 22 extensions are Galois.
  • Quadratic extensions are always expressible by adjoining a square root. Thus they are simple extensions, and simple extensions are finite and separable.
  • Degree 22 is the minimum degree required to split an irreducible quadratic polynomial. Since every irreducible with a root in the quadratic extension must split in the extension, quadratic extensions are normal.
  • So quadratic extensions are finite separable and normal, meaning they’re Galois extensions.

Kummer’s Theorem: (for prime pp) A degree pp extension K/FK/F is Galois iff KK is expressible by adjoining a ppth root of an element aFa\in F, whenever FF is a subfield of C\CC containing the ppth roots of unity ζp\zeta_p.
  • (\to) If K/FK/F is Galois of degree pp, then K=F(α)K=F(\alpha) for some ppth root α\alpha of an element in FF.
    • Since K/FK/F is Galois of degree pp, its Galois group G(K/F)G(K/F) is cyclic with a generator σ\sigma.
    • Since pchar "338=1p\ne 1, σ\sigma is not the identity. Therefore there must be some element αK\alpha\in K not fixed by σ\sigma. Let ff be the minimal polynomial of α\alpha.
    • The orbit of σ\sigma under G(K/F)G(K/F) contains all the roots of ff, since G(K/F)G(K/F) must act transitively on the roots of ff. Since K/FK/F is separable, these roots are distinct, and therefore there are pp roots.
    • As ff is a degree pp irreducible polynomial in a field FF containing the ppth roots of unity, it must be the polynomial xpax^p-a for some aFa\in F. This implies α\alpha is a ppth root.
    • Since every root is expressible in terms of α\alpha, F(α)F(\alpha) is a splitting field of ff. But since K/FK/F is normal, KK is also a splitting field of ff containing the exact same roots. Thus they must be the same field: K=F(α)K=F(\alpha) (not merely an isomorphism)
    • Thus KK is obtained by adjoining a ppth root.
  • (\from) If K=F(α)K=F(\alpha) for some ppth root α\alpha of an element aa in FF, then K/FK/F is Galois of degree pp.
    • α\alpha is a root of its minimal polynomial xpax^p-a, and therefore is a ppth root of aa. We can write the ppth roots of aa as ζpkα\zeta_p^k\alpha, and they are all in KK since we assume ζpF\zeta_p\in F. Thus xpax^p-a splits in KK.
    • The derivative of xpax^p-a is pxp1px^{p-1}. Assuming we’re not in characteristic pp, xpax^p-a shares no roots with its derivative and is therefore separable.
    • Any polynomial with a root in KK can express that root in terms of α\alpha, since K=F(α)K=F(\alpha) is simple. Since the minimal polynomial of α\alpha splits in KK into distinct roots, any polynomial with a root in KK must split in KK as well into distinct roots. Therefore, K/FK/F is normal and separable and therefore Galois. Since xpax^p-a is the minimal polynomial of α\alpha and is of degree pp, K/FK/F is of degree pp.

Such extensions KK are Kummer extensions, characterized by the fact that if a field contains the ppth roots of unity, you can obtain a degree pp Galois extension by adjoining any ppth root that isn’t in the base field. This is a generalization of quadratic extensions (where p=2p=2), in which you obtain a degree 22 Galois extension by adjoining any square root not in the base field.

In this section, we generalize a correspondence between the Galois group of an extension and its intermediate fields.

Let’s revisit the intermediate fields of the splitting field of x32x^3-2:

K F (∛2, ζ 3 ∛2) Fr F ( ζ 3 ) K--Fr Fs F (∛2) K--Fs Frs F ( ζ 3 ∛2) K--Frs Fr2s F ( ζ 3 2 ∛2) K--Fr2s F F Fr--F Fs--F Frs--F Fr2s--F

It turns out the Galois group for this extension is the symmetric group S3S_3. Now notice how the subgroup diagram of S3S_3 below looks exactly like the intermediate field diagram above, but flipped upside-down:

G S 3 = ⟨(1 2 3),(1 2)⟩ Ga ⟨(1 2 3)⟩ G--Ga Gb ⟨(1 2)⟩ G--Gb Gab ⟨(2 3)⟩ G--Gab Ga2b ⟨(1 3)⟩ G--Ga2b trivial {(1)} Ga--trivial Gb--trivial Gab--trivial Ga2b--trivial

In fact, the subgroups of S3S_3 directly correspond a set of permutations of the three roots of x32x^3-2. The correspondence between subgroups of S3S_3 and the corresponding intermediate field is that each intermediate field LL contains all the elements KHK^H that are fixed by every FF-automorphism in the corresponding subgroup HH of the Galois group G(K/F)G(K/F). Call KHK^H the fixed field of HH.

Lemma: The intersection of two subfields is a subfield of both.
  • Since F1F_1 and F2F_2 are fields and therefore integral domains, their subring F1F2F_1\cap F_2 is also an integral domain.
  • All that is left is to show every nonzero element of F1F2F_1\cap F_2 has a multiplicative inverse. But since F1F_1 and F2F_2 both have the same multiplicative inverses for all their nonzero elements, so does F1F2F_1\cap F_2.

Theorem: The fixed field KHK^H of a subgroup HH of a field extension K/FK/F is an intermediate field of K/FK/F.

We already know that a single FF-automorphism defines an intermediate field of K/FK/F. A subgroup containing multiple FF-automorphisms will fix elements KHK^H corresponding to the intersection of the fixed elements of each individual FF-automorphism. Being an intersection of subfields of KK, KHK^H must be a subfield of each of those subfields, and is therefore also a subfield of KK containing FF (i.e. an intermediate field of K/FK/F.)

This is enough to prove that in general, the intermediate fields of a Galois extension correspond to the subfields of the Galois group.

Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory: If K/FK/F is Galois, its intermediate fields LL are in a one-to-one correspondence with the subgroups of its Galois group G(K/F)G(K/F).
  • First, for every intermediate field LL, we can identify the permutations of KK that fix LL, which is the Galois group G(K/L)G(K/L). Call this map σ=LG(K/L)\sigma=L\mapsto G(K/L).

  • Second, for every subgroup HG(K/F)H\le G(K/F), we can identify the elements of KK fixed by every permutation in HH, which is its fixed field KHK^H. Call this map τ=HKH\tau=H\mapsto K^H.

  • The theorem states that σ\sigma and τ\tau are inverses. In other words, the subset relations below are actually equalities:

    L L K G ( K / L ) G_KL G ( K / L ) L:l->G_KL σ G_KL->L:r τ H H G ( K / K H ) K_H K H H:l->K_H τ K_H->H:r σ
  • This essentially only requires us to prove two things:

  • For σ=LG(K/L)\sigma=L\mapsto G(K/L): we must have [K:L]=G(K/L)[K:L]=|G(K/L)|.

    • Let G=G(K/L)G=G(K/L). Recall that GG is exactly all the automorphisms of KK that fix LL. This is a subgroup of G(K/F)G(K/F).
    • Since K/LK/L is finite and separable, it has a primitive element α\alpha. Let ff be its minimal polynomial.
    • Apply the orbit-stabilizer theorem on the action of GG on the roots of ff. The orbit-stabilizer theorem states that the size of the orbit of α\alpha is equal to the size of the group divided by the size of the stabilizer of α\alpha: Oα=G/Gα|O_\alpha|=|G|/|G_\alpha|. Choosing α\alpha as a primitive element makes it so its stabilizer GαG_\alpha is trivial, since if an automorphism fixes α\alpha, it fixes the whole extension.
    • We know that Gα=1|G_\alpha|=1, therefore the order of GG matches the order of the orbit of α\alpha. We just need to show that there are [K:L][K:L] elements in the orbit of α\alpha.
    • Since the minimal polynomial of α\alpha is irreducible over LL, its Galois group GG acts transitively on its roots. Therefore all of its roots are in the orbit of α\alpha. Since K/LK/L is separable, the roots α\alpha are distinct, meaning the number of roots is equal to the degree [K:L][K:L] of the extension.
  • For τ=HKH\tau=H\mapsto K^H: we must have H=[K:KH]|H|=[K:K^H].

    • Since KHK^H is an intermediate field of K/FK/F, we know K/KHK/K^H is Galois, and therefore G(K/KH)=[K:KH]|G(K/K^H)|=[K:K^H].
    • The automorphisms of KK that fix the fixed group of HH are exactly HH, so G(K/KH)=HG(K/K^H)=H by definition. Therefore H=[K:KH]|H|=[K:K^H].

Because of this fundamental correspondence, the arduous task of studying the intermediate fields of a Galois extension can be reduced to the much simpler tasks of studying the subgroups of its Galois group.

Recall that all splitting fields in characteristic 00 are Galois extensions. Since each splitting field is defined over an irreducible polynomial, we can assign to each irreducible polynomial the Galois group of its splitting field. In fact, you can go to this website to look up the Galois group of every irreducible polynomial in Z[x]\ZZ[x]!

< Back to category Exploration 8: Galois theory (permalink)
Exploration 7: Fields Exploration 9: Solvability