tinytheorems - about groups - rings - modules - models atom/rss

Exploration 2: Ring homomorphisms

.

Questions:


Just like with groups, there are ring homomorphisms: maps between rings that preserve the ring properties. While group homomorphisms need only preserve the identity and the group product, ring homomorphisms must preserve addition, multiplication, and the multiplicative identity. (Since 11=01-1=0, preserving the multiplicative identity 11 also preserves the additive identity 00.) Therefore all ring homomorphisms are also group homomorphisms of the rings’ additive abelian groups.

Theorem: Ring homomorphisms θ\theta preserve rational expressions (expressions involving addition, subtraction, multiplication, integer scalar multiplication, powers, and division by units).
  • By induction on the rational expression.
  • a,bR.a+bR    θ(a)+θ(b)R\forall a,b\in R\ldotp a+b\in R\implies \theta(a)+\theta(b)\in R since rings are closed under addition by definition, and homomorphisms preserve addition.
  • a,bR.abR    θ(a)θ(b)R\forall a,b\in R\ldotp a-b\in R\implies \theta(a)-\theta(b)\in R since rings are closed under addition and additive inverse by definition, and homomorphisms preserve addition and additive inverse.
  • a,bR.abR    θ(a)θ(b)R\forall a,b\in R\ldotp ab\in R\implies \theta(a)\theta(b)\in R since rings are closed under multiplication by definition, and homomorphisms preserve multiplication. This also implies that units are preserved, because ab=1ab=1 implies θ(a)θ(b)=θ(1)\theta(a)\theta(b)=\theta(1).
  • aR,kZ.kaR    kθ(a)R\forall a\in R,k\in\ZZ\ldotp ka\in R\implies k\theta(a)\in R since this is just repeated addition, and rings are closed under addition by definition, and homomorphisms preserve addition.
  • aR,kZ.akR    θ(a)kR\forall a\in R,k\in\ZZ\ldotp a^k\in R\implies \theta(a)^k\in R since this is just repeated multiplication, and rings are closed under multiplication by definition, and homomorphisms preserve multiplication.
  • aR,bR×.a/bR    θ(a)/θ(b)R\forall a\in R,b\in R^\times\ldotp a/b\in R\implies \theta(a)/\theta(b)\in R since this is just multiplication by multiplicative inverse, and rings are closed under multiplication by definition, and homomorphisms preserve multiplication and units.

Theorem: Ring homomorphisms preserve units, idempotents, and nilpotents.
  • Since a ring homomorphism must preserve equations composed of only rational expressions, it preserves the equation ab=1ab=1. But that’s just the definition of being a unit.
  • The same goes for r2=rr^2=r (idempotents) and rn=0r^n=0 (nilpotents).

Theorem: Ring homomorphisms preserve characteristic.
  • This is a direct consequence of preserving addition and the multiplicative identity 11: if n1R=0n\cdot 1_R=0 in RR, then that maps to n1S=0n\cdot 1_S=0 in SS.

The kernel ker θ\ker\theta of a ring homomorphism θ:RS\theta:R\to S is the subset of elements in RR that get mapped to 0S0_S by θ\theta.

Theorem: The kernel of a ring homomorphism θ:RS\theta:R\to S is an ideal of RR.

Kernel is always an additive subgroup of RR, like from group theory. To show it absorbs product and is therefore an ideal, note that θ(ker θ)={0}\theta(\ker\theta)=\{0\} by definition, and 00 absorbs all products.

The image im θ\im\theta of a ring homomorphism θ:RS\theta:R\to S is the subset of elements in SS that get mapped to θ\theta.

Theorem: The image of a ring homomorphism θ:RS\theta:R\to S is a subring of SS.

Since θ\theta is a ring homomorphism, this is implied. im θ\im\theta is an additive subgroup closed under multiplication, and θ\theta preserves unity.

Just like with group homomorphisms, if a ring homomorphism has trivial kernel, it is injective — θ(r)=θ(s)\theta(r)=\theta(s) implies r=sr=s.

Theorem: If a ring homomorphism θ:RS\theta:R\to S has trivial kernel, then it is injective.
  • (\to) If the kernel is trivial (only 00 maps to 00), then θ(r)=θ(s)\theta(r)=\theta(s) i.e. θ(rs)=0\theta(r-s)=0 implies rsr-s must be 00, which means r=sr=s.
  • (\from) If θ(r)=θ(s)\theta(r)=\theta(s) implies r=sr=s, then in particular θ(r)=θ(0)=0\theta(r)=\theta(0)=0 implies r=0r=0, i.e. only 00 can map to 00, which means the kernel is trivial.

If RR is a field FF, then ring homomorphisms become field homomorphisms. Field homomorphisms are just ring homomorphisms in the sense that they need only respect the ring axioms. However, the nature of fields gives all field homomorphisms certain properties:

Theorem: Every field homomorphism is injective.

In this section, we learn some ways to construct ring homomorphisms.

We learned earlier that we can quotient a ring RR by an ideal II to get a quotient ring R/IR/I where all elements of II are sent to 00. Since the result is a ring, the coset map π:RR/I\pi:R\to R/I is always a ring homomorphism.

What happens if we send an element rRr\in R to another element ss?

Therefore: Renaming rRr\in R to sRs\in R, i.e. making the two elements equal in RR, is a ring homomorphism.
  • Sending an element rRr\in R to sRs\in R is the same as making the two elements equal in RR.
  • That is, we’re enforcing the equation r=sr=s in RR.
  • One way to do this is to note that the equation is equal to rs=0r-s=0. Then sending the element rsr-s to 00 is the same as making r=sr=s in RR.
  • But that’s the same as quotienting by the principal ideal (rs)(r-s), and we know that quotient is always a ring homomorphism.

In this section, we show how to use the First Isomorphism Theorem to quickly prove facts about rings by constructing a homomorphism.

First Isomorphism Theorem: Given a ring homomorphism θ:RS\theta:R\to S, R/ker θim θR/\ker\theta\iso\im\theta.
  • Just like we did in proving the First Isomorphism Theorem for groups, we prove that the map θˉ=[r]θ(r):R/ker θim θ\bar{\theta}=[r]\mapsto\theta(r):R/\ker\theta\to\im\theta is a ring isomorphism.
  • θˉ\bar{\theta} is well defined: ker θ\ker\theta is an ideal of RR (proof) so R/ker θR/\ker\theta is a well-defined factor ring. Then from the universal property of the group quotient, we know that θˉ\bar{\theta} is a well-defined group homomorphism.
  • θˉ\bar{\theta} preserves unity and product: they are basically inherited from θ\theta.
    • θˉ([1])=θ(1)=1\bar{\theta}([1])=\theta(1)=1
    • θˉ([a][b])=θˉ([ab])=θ(ab)=θ(a)θ(b)\bar{\theta}([a][b])=\bar{\theta}([ab])=\theta(ab)=\theta(a)\theta(b)
  • Therefore, θˉ\bar{\theta} is also a ring homomorphism.
  • θˉ\bar{\theta} is bijective: θˉ\bar{\theta} is onto, since the output is θ(r)\theta(r) for all rRr\in R, which encompasses im θ\im\theta. The reverse direction of the proof above for [a]=[b]    θ(a)=θ(b)[a]=[b]\iff\theta(a)=\theta(b) shows θˉ\bar{\theta} is one-to-one.
  • Therefore, θˉ\bar{\theta} is an isomorphism.

In general, we define a isomorphism θ:RS\theta:R\to S. Then the first isomorphism theorem gives you R/(ker θ)SR/(\ker\theta)\iso S. Here’s an example of how it can be used:

Theorem: For nZn\in\ZZ, the quotient Z/(n)\ZZ/(n) is isomorphic to Zn\ZZ_n, the integers mod nn.
  • Define the map θ:ZZn\theta:\ZZ\to\ZZ_n, which is just the residue map from the integers to their corresponding equivalence class in Zn\ZZ_n. This map is obviously surjective, since each class in Zn\ZZ_n is typically represented by some integer in Z\ZZ.
  • The kernel of θ\theta is exactly every multiple of nn, i.e. the principal ideal generated by nn.
  • By the First Isomorphism Theorem, we have R/ker θim θR/\ker\theta\iso\im\theta. With ker θ=(n)\ker\theta=(n) and im θ=Z/(n)\im\theta=\ZZ/(n) (since it is surjective), we get R/(n)Z/(n)R/(n)\iso\ZZ/(n).

Here’s another isomorphism theorem:

Theorem: (R×S)/(A×B)R/A×S/B(R\times S)/(A\times B)\iso R/A\times S/B.
  • The map (r,s)([r]A,[s]B)(r,s)\mapsto ([r]_A,[s]_B) has kernel A×BA\times B and image R/A×S/BR/A\times S/B.
  • By the First Isomorphism Theorem, (R×S)/ker θim θ(R\times S)/\ker\theta\iso\im\theta, so we get (R×S)/(A×B)R/A×S/B(R\times S)/(A\times B)\iso R/A\times S/B immediately.

Recall that the sum of two ideals is an ideal.

Chinese Remainder Theorem: Given A,BA,B ideals of RR, A+B=R    R/(AB)R/A×R/BA+B=R\implies R/(A\cap B)\iso R/A\times R/B

Let ψ=r([r]A,[r]B)\psi=r\mapsto ([r]_A,[r]_B), which you can check is a surjective homomorphism. Then the result is provided by the First Isomorphism Theorem, since ker ψ=AB\ker\psi=A\cap B, and by surjectivity, im ψ=R/A×R/B\im\psi=R/A\times R/B.

Corollary: When AB={0}A\cap B=\{0\}, we get R/{0}RR/A×R/BR/\{0\}\iso R\iso R/A\times R/B.

< Back to category Exploration 2: Ring homomorphisms (permalink)
Exploration 1: Rings and ideals Exploration 3: Polynomials