Exploration 2: Ring homomorphisms
November 30, 2023.Questions:
- TODO
Just like with groups, there are ring homomorphisms: maps between rings that preserve the ring properties. While group homomorphisms need only preserve the identity and the group product, ring homomorphisms must preserve addition, multiplication, and the multiplicative identity. (Since , preserving the multiplicative identity also preserves the additive identity .) Therefore all ring homomorphisms are also group homomorphisms of the rings’ additive abelian groups.
- By induction on the rational expression.
- since rings are closed under addition by definition, and homomorphisms preserve addition.
- since rings are closed under addition and additive inverse by definition, and homomorphisms preserve addition and additive inverse.
- since rings are closed under multiplication by definition, and homomorphisms preserve multiplication. This also implies that units are preserved, because implies .
- since this is just repeated addition, and rings are closed under addition by definition, and homomorphisms preserve addition.
- since this is just repeated multiplication, and rings are closed under multiplication by definition, and homomorphisms preserve multiplication.
- since this is just multiplication by multiplicative inverse, and rings are closed under multiplication by definition, and homomorphisms preserve multiplication and units.
- Since a ring homomorphism must preserve equations composed of only rational expressions, it preserves the equation . But that’s just the definition of being a unit.
- The same goes for (idempotents) and (nilpotents).
- This is a direct consequence of preserving addition and the multiplicative identity : if in , then that maps to in .
The kernel of a ring homomorphism is the subset of elements in that get mapped to by .
Kernel is always an additive subgroup of , like from group theory. To show it absorbs product and is therefore an ideal, note that by definition, and absorbs all products.
The image of a ring homomorphism is the subset of elements in that get mapped to .
Since is a ring homomorphism, this is implied. is an additive subgroup closed under multiplication, and preserves unity.
Just like with group homomorphisms, if a ring homomorphism has trivial kernel, it is injective — implies .
- () If the kernel is trivial (only maps to ), then i.e. implies must be , which means .
- () If implies , then in particular implies , i.e. only can map to , which means the kernel is trivial.
If is a field , then ring homomorphisms become field homomorphisms. Field homomorphisms are just ring homomorphisms in the sense that they need only respect the ring axioms. However, the nature of fields gives all field homomorphisms certain properties:
- Since the kernel of a ring homomorphism is an ideal of , and the only ideals in a field are and itself, the kernel is either trivial () or itself.
- But since ring homomorphisms must preserve the multiplicative identity , the kernel cannot include (since it doesn’t get mapped to zero).
- Therefore the kernel is trivial, so is injective.
In this section, we learn some ways to construct ring homomorphisms.
We learned earlier that we can quotient a ring by an ideal to get a quotient ring where all elements of are sent to . Since the result is a ring, the coset map is always a ring homomorphism.
What happens if we send an element to another element ?
- Sending an element to is the same as making the two elements equal in .
- That is, we’re enforcing the equation in .
- One way to do this is to note that the equation is equal to . Then sending the element to is the same as making in .
- But that’s the same as quotienting by the principal ideal , and we know that quotient is always a ring homomorphism.
In this section, we show how to use the First Isomorphism Theorem to quickly prove facts about rings by constructing a homomorphism.
- Just like we did in proving the First Isomorphism Theorem for groups, we prove that the map is a ring isomorphism.
- is well defined: is an ideal of (proof) so is a well-defined factor ring. Then from the universal property of the group quotient, we know that is a well-defined group homomorphism.
-
preserves unity and product: they are basically inherited from
.
- Therefore, is also a ring homomorphism.
- is bijective: is onto, since the output is for all , which encompasses . The reverse direction of the proof above for shows is one-to-one.
- Therefore, is an isomorphism.
In general, we define a isomorphism . Then the first isomorphism theorem gives you . Here’s an example of how it can be used:
- Define the map , which is just the residue map from the integers to their corresponding equivalence class in . This map is obviously surjective, since each class in is typically represented by some integer in .
- The kernel of is exactly every multiple of , i.e. the principal ideal generated by .
- By the First Isomorphism Theorem, we have . With and (since it is surjective), we get .
Here’s another isomorphism theorem:
- The map has kernel and image .
- By the First Isomorphism Theorem, , so we get immediately.
Recall that the sum of two ideals is an ideal.
Let , which you can check is a surjective homomorphism. Then the result is provided by the First Isomorphism Theorem, since , and by surjectivity, .
Corollary: When , we get .
< Back to category Exploration 2: Ring homomorphisms (permalink)Exploration 1: Rings and ideals